Sunday, 17 February 2013

The end of Lehman Brothers


As stage four of the financial crisis (distress) progressed, Lehman’s management realised that the crisis was more severe than they had previously thought.  The counter cyclical strategy pursued had cost Lehman a huge share price decrease (shown in graph 1) and massive losses.

Many rumours circulated about Lehman’s financial health and the interbank market froze, reluctant to lend. This lack of confidence resulted in Lehman not securing the vital funds it needed for daily operations. On the 15th of September 2008 Lehman Brothers filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. This became the largest corporate bankruptcy in the U.S history with $639 billion in assets, the great ‘Wall Street Titan’ had fallen (Craig et al, 2008).

If you have an hour to spare and want to learn more about the end of Lehman Brothers the film below entitled “The Last Days of Lehman Brothers” provides a good overview of the run up to Lehman’s bankruptcy.





Graph 1 showing Lehman Brothers share price (May 2007 – August 2008)


(FT, 2008)


Bibliography

1.      Craig, S. et al. (2008) AIG, Lehman Shock Hits World Markets. The Wall Street Journal, 16 Sept. Available at: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122152314746339697.html.

Wednesday, 6 February 2013

The rise of Lehman Brothers


Lehman Brothers was established in 1850 when Henry Lehman and his brothers started up a shop which sold to local farmers (Harvard, 2012) and from these humble beginnings Lehman rose to become America’s 4th largest investment bank. Lehman’s rise in the 21st century originated from a change in strategy. This was driven by the Federal Reserve slashing interest rates to 1% (Displacement: stage one of financial crisis). Following this Lehman moved through stage two (credit expansion) and stage three (bubble/mania) of financial crisis.


Lehman Brothers logo (Google Images, 2013)

Traditionally Lehman had pursued a low risk strategy which involved originating and purchasing assets to sell them on while not investing their own capital or holding assets on their balance sheet.  In the early 2000s the bank decided to change to an aggressive, higher risk strategy which involved using their own capital to buy assets and then storing these assets. Management at Lehman believed they were missing out on the advantages of the bullish market that many of their competitors were exploiting (Valukas, 2010). Although this high risk strategy was not uncommon among investment banks, it proved especially risky for Lehman as they had a small equity base and high leverage (Valukas, 2010).

As the boom (stage two of crisis) progressed Lehman invested heavily in property, leveraged loans and the mortgage market including the sub-prime market. The aim of this strategy was high revenue growth which was achieved by an increase in the bank’s balance sheet and risk. 

The crisis then progressed into stage three and a bubble began to form as the economy expanded. The market reacted positively to Lehman’s new aggressive growth strategy, with share price increasing steadily to peak in February 2007 at $85.80 (Bebchuk et al, 2009) and analysts at the major credit rating agencies such as Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s  giving Lehman positive investment grade ratings.

When the sub-prime crisis set in, Lehman believed that by pursuing a counter-cyclical strategy they could increase their advantage over competitors. At this time the economy had moved to stage four of the crisis: distress, but behaviour at Lehman still displayed signs of a stage three crisis for example mania and irrational exuberance*. Lehman had pursued this counter-cyclical strategy before during the downturn of 2001-2002 and it had proved successful, leading to an increased market share, so they continued their aggressive capital destructive strategy when many other banks were raising and hoarding capital (Cohan, 2012). This pursuit of market domination was what ultimately led to the downfall of Lehman.

Graphs illustrating the aggressive growth strategy at Lehman: First graph showing the increase in asset base and the second showing increasing net revenue



(Both graphs composed using data cited in Valukas, 2010)

Irrational Exuberance: “Unsustainable investor enthusiasm that drives asset prices up to levels that aren’t supported by fundamentals” (Investopedia, 2013)


Bibliography

1.      Bebchuk et al . (2009). The wages of failure: executive compensation at Bear Sterns and Lehman 2000-2008. Harvard Law School : Discussion Paper. 657 (1), 1-28. (Available at http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/olin_center/papers/pdf/Bebchuk_657.pdf)
2.      Cohan, W. (2012) Lehman E-mails Show Wall Street Arrogance Led to the Fall. Available: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-05-06/lehman-e-mails-show-wall-street-arrogance-led-to-the-fall.html. Last accessed 3rd Feb 2013
3.      Craig, S. et al (2008) AIG, Lehman Shock Hits World Markets. The Wall Street Journal, 16 Sept. Available at: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122152314746339697.html
4.      Harvard Business School. (2012) History of Lehman Brothers.  .Available: http://www.library.hbs.edu/hc/lehman/history.html. Last accessed 3rd Feb 2013.
5.      Investopedia. (2012). Irrational Exuberance  Available: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/irrationalexuberance.asp#axzz2K9e2BRip. Last accessed 6th Feb 2013.
6.      Valukas, A. ( 2010) Lehman Brothers Holding Inc. Chapter 11 Proceedings Examiner Report. Jenner & Block, Volumes: 1-9    



Financial Crises: An Introduction


A financial crisis is “a disturbance to financial markets, associated typically with falling asset prices and insolvency among debtors and intermediaries, which spreads through the financial system, disrupting the market’s capacity to allocate capital”
 (Portes & Swoboda, 1987: p10)

Throughout history there have been numerous financial crises that vary in strength and location. The most notable financial crises include the great depression in the US (1929), the oil crisis in 1973, the Asian financial crisis (1997), the bursting of the dot com bubble (2001), the financial crisis of 2007-2010 and most recently the European debt crisis (2010).

In a financial crisis the economy goes through a series of stages, Kindleberger (1989) defined these stages as follows:

Stage 1: Displacement: Displacement occurs when there is an outside shock to the economic system which modifies the outlook of the economy

·       In the case of the 2007-2009 financial crisis the shock was the slashing  of short term interest rates to 1% by the Federal Reserve- aimed at stimulating growth in the sluggish economy

Stage 2: Boom/Credit Expansion: These low interest rates stimulated a boom in housing as mortgages were cheaper to attain. This boom increased house prices and construction rates raised to satisfy demand

Stage 3: Bubble/Mania:  A large proportion of the population became involved in the housing boom and segments of the population usually not included become involved, for example, sub-prime mortgage holders.       This led to speculation for profits and rationality gave way to irrationality and mania

Stage 4: Distress: In the US interest rates began to rise, leading to a fall in house prices and many sub-prime mortgage holders were unable to meet repayments. At this stage the bubble begins to unravel

Stage 5: Crash and Panic: System unstable and close to crashing. Panic was triggered by the failure of many financial institutions for example that of Lehman Brothers in 2008


The graph below illustrates the movement in the interest rate in the US between January 2000 and January 2010. The fall in interest rates as described in Stage 1 is evident as is the rise described in Stage 4.

(Source: www.tradingeconomics.com FEDERAL RESERVE)


In my blog I am going to explore the rise and fall of Lehman Brothers. I believe the rise and fall of Lehman mirrors the rise and fall of the global economy and illustrates the five stages of a financial crisis. I will research Lehman Brothers and aim to define:

·       How Lehman Brothers moves through the stages of the crisis
·       The reasons behind the failure of Lehman Brothers
·       How this failure is connected to the economy
·       The impact of Lehman’s failure on the economy

If you are interested in learning more about the causes of the most recent financial crisis (2007-2009) the video below provides a short summary of what went wrong.






Bibliography

1.      Kindleberger, C.P. Manias, Panics and Crashes: A History of Financial Crises, rev. ed. Basic Books, New York, 1989.
2.      Portes, R. and Swoboda, A. (1987) "Anatomy of Financial Crises." From Threats to International Financial Stability, pp. 10-58. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
3.      Trading Economics. (2013). United States Interest Rates. Available: http://www.tradingeconomics.com/united-states/interest-rate. Last accessed 4th Feb 2013.